Skip to navigationSkip to contentSkip to footerHelp using this website - Accessibility statement
  • Advertisement

    A smarter way to tax high super balances

    The government has tried to keep things simple, but in doing so fairness has gone out the window.

    Meg Heffron
    Meg HeffronContributor

    Subscribe to gift this article

    Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

    Subscribe now

    Already a subscriber?

    In their quieter moments, many people with more than $3 million in super feel it’s reasonable to pay more tax on their super savings. Their objection to the proposal before parliament (known as “division 296” tax) is often
    not about paying more tax – it’s that the method proposed for working it out feels wrong.

    Super is often criticised for being complex. When it comes to this tax, the government has tried to keep things simple. But in doing so, fairness has completely gone out the window.

    Subscribe to gift this article

    Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

    Subscribe now

    Already a subscriber?

    Read More

    Latest In Personal finance

    Fetching latest articles

    Most Viewed In Wealth