Skip to navigationSkip to contentSkip to footerHelp using this website - Accessibility statement
  • Advertisement

    Opinion

    Matthew Stevens

    Melbourne's port plan contains disruptor

    Why should our customers pay for infrastructure that will only make our competitors stronger, asks the best-performed waterfront disruptor.

    Matthew StevensColumnist

    Subscribe to gift this article

    Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

    Subscribe now

    Already a subscriber?

    The emerging third stevedore at the Port of Melbourne has complained that the new private equity owner of Australia’s biggest container hub is “unduly focused” on legacy operators, who it claims are favoured when it comes to both rents and infrastructure investment.

    In a combative submission to the Essential Service Commission’s Market Rent Inquiry, Victoria International Container Terminal (VICT) delivered a compounding slate of criticism of post-privatisation operation of the port, where management is accused of concentrating on revenue flows at the expense of access and efficiency.

    Subscribe to gift this article

    Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

    Subscribe now

    Already a subscriber?

    Read More

    Latest In Infrastructure

    Fetching latest articles

    Most Viewed In Companies